Skip to content
Assessment
LibraryPeople

Why farm workers leave when the pay is good

The count of people who left in the last two years is in your payroll records. Sorted by reason, it shows whether another raise would have kept them, or whether the job in writing, a planned first day, a rule for raises and a manager's limits would have done more.

Published Updated 16 min read
In this article

The number of people who left your farm in the last 24 months is in your payroll records, the first number to check before the next raise. At an example apple orchard in the Yakima Valley, Washington, a raise of $1 an hour for 26 workers costs $54,080 a year, and nine people left in two years. In a survey of California dairies, pay and benefits were the top reason for leaving, at 29%, and four reasons the employer sets day to day added up to 34%. Once the wage is at market, how you manage weighs as much as a raise, sometimes more. List each departure and its reason, then fill in a one-page sheet with four yes-or-no lines.

The sheet checks your management, not any worker’s performance. Filling it in promises nothing about the next worker.

What reasons did people give for leaving?

Gregorio Billikopf and Gustavo González, in a 2012 paper in the journal California Agriculture, interviewed 209 dairy workers in three San Joaquin Valley counties in 2009. The 114 who had left earlier dairy jobs reported 222 of them, and each gave a main reason for each departure. Pay and benefits led, at 29%, and most of the reasons below it were ones the employer sets day to day.

The main reasons workers gave for leaving an earlier dairy job, and each one’s share of the 222 departures
Reason given for leaving a dairy job Share of the 222 departures
Pay and benefits 29%
The dairy’s own money trouble 14%
A personal or family reason 11%
Work schedule and time off 11%
Housing and transport 8%
The relationship with the boss 8%
The job and its duties 7%
Let go 7%
Co-workers 3%
Hurt on the job 2%
Left to start their own dairy 0.5%
Figure: Share of the 222 departures by reason, with the four day-to-day reasons added up. Source: Billikopf and González, 2012, Table 1; the 34% is a sum of those rows
The four day-to-day reasons were named a little more often than payOf 222 departures from dairy jobs in California, pay and benefits were the main reason in 29%. The four reasons the employer sets day to day added up to 34%: work schedule and time off 11%, housing and transport 8%, the relationship with the boss 8%, the job and its duties 7%.Share of the 222 departuresPay and benefits29%The four day-to-day reasons together34%The four, one by oneWork schedule and time off11%Housing and transport8%The relationship with the boss8%The job and its duties7%

All 209 respondents were men, interviewed at dairies where the researcher stopped to ask, and the study left out workers who had left dairy work for good. On your farm the shares will land elsewhere. What carries over is the split: pay is one reason among several, and the four day-to-day reasons together were named a little more often than pay.

Open your payroll records, list the people who left in the last 24 months, and write the reason each one gave beside the name. Where nobody asked, write “unknown”. At the example orchard, whose figures are invented for illustration, two of the nine named pay, five named the schedule, the housing, the boss or the job, and two named family.

Does pay still matter, then?

Yes, and the research warns against reading what leavers say as proof that it does not. Sara Rynes and two colleagues reviewed the research in 2004, in the journal Human Resource Management. They found that pay matters more in people’s actual choices and behavior than in what they say motivates them, and that it is not equally important in every situation or to every person. Those were workers in general, not farm workers. A worker who says money was not the reason may have left over it. Keep the wage fair and at market first. The sheet is for what weighs beyond a wage that is already fair.

Malcolm Hobbs and two colleagues asked 611 vineyard workers in Napa County, California, to rate 11 parts of the job and say whether they planned to leave. Workers there were generally content with their pay. The analysis used 402 complete answers, and four parts predicted plans to leave: communication, pay, family commitments and the nature of the farm work. Each part got a score, and a higher score means a better predictor. Communication scored highest and pay came second, close behind.

Figure: How well each part of the job predicted plans to leave among Napa vineyard workers; a higher score is a better predictor. Source: Hobbs, Klachky and Cooper, 2020
Communication predicted plans to leave best, with pay close behindScores for the four parts of the job that predicted plans to leave among Napa vineyard workers: communication 0.23, pay 0.20, family commitments 0.19, the nature of the farm work 0.19.Score as a predictor of plans to leaveCommunication0.23Pay0.20Family commitments0.19The nature of the farm work0.19

The authors conclude that better communication, more variety in tasks and consideration for family commitments can influence turnover more than further pay increases alone. Mallika Roy and colleagues, in a 2026 paper in PLOS ONE, surveyed 1,202 current and potential workers in Queensland, Australia, about banana work. They report that its appeal is driven more strongly by the conditions of the job than by purely economic incentives.

Read all of this as what people said, not what they did. Hobbs states that the analysis cannot show cause. The banana study was one crop in one country, in an online survey of people who had not necessarily left. The honest reading is that management weighs heavily and pay still counts. Each departure also has a cost, and how much turnover costs your farm puts a yearly number on it from your records.

What goes on the sheet?

Four lines, each answered yes or no, and a document to write for each no. Stanley Moore and colleagues, in a 2020 study in the Journal of Dairy Science, collected the views of 168 employees on 12 large US dairy farms. Employees reported a higher intention to stay when their employer scored higher on questions about the relationship between employer and employee. The authors also note that farms adopt human resource practices very unevenly. How people are managed differs from farm to farm, and that part is yours to change.

The four lines of the sheet, the yes-or-no question for each, and where to learn to write the document
Line The question you answer yes or no If the answer is no, write Where to learn how
Job Does each person have in writing what their job is responsible for? A list of duties for each job what each job is responsible for
First day Did the last new hire get a planned first day? A first-day list the first-day list
Praise and raises Do praise and raises follow a written rule? A recognition rule, and pay bands (a pay range for each job) with a raise rule the recognition rule and pay bands with a raise rule
Manager Does your manager have in writing what they may decide without you? A signed list of what your manager decides alone what your manager decides alone
Figure: The sheet with its four lines, each to be answered yes or no
The sheet: four lines, each answered yes or noJob: a page of duties for each person. First day: a written plan and one person to guide the new hire. Praise and raises: a written rule for praise and a pay range for each job. Manager: a list signed by both of you of what the manager decides alone.The sheet, four linesJobA page of duties foreach personyesnoFirst dayA written plan and oneperson to guide the hireyesnoPraise and raisesA written rule for praise,a pay range for each jobyesnoManagerA list signed by both ofyou of what they decideyesno

Two of the four day-to-day reasons stay off the sheet. The work schedule has its own article, who else can do each job, and housing has no document in the people section yet. Check both apart: is the schedule known in advance, and is the housing fit to live in?

How do the four lines work on a farm?

The job line and the manager line ask one question about two people: does each know where their own decisions begin and end? With a page of duties, the worker knows. With a signed list of what the manager decides alone, the manager knows.

Mengfen Lan and colleagues studied 352 hotel employees in 2025, not farm workers. They started from the idea that clear job requirements give an employee enough information to act, which can reduce the uncertainty of deciding. They found that clear roles can increase taking charge, meaning workers who act beyond their assigned tasks. A tractor driver unsure what the job covers has to ask before each decision. The fix is a list of duties for each job, and what each job is responsible for shows how to write one.

If you never wrote down what your manager may decide, neither the manager nor the crew can see where it ends, and the first worker with a doubt comes to you. With a list signed by both of you, you can hand over decisions and still know what is settled. If you have no manager, the same holds for the foreman who runs the crew when you are away. What your manager decides alone shows how to write the list.

The first day is where training starts. In the Australian banana study, training and development, and supportive work environments, were the most consistent and influential factors in how attractive workers found the work. A new hire handed a truck key on the first morning and pointed at a block may conclude that you do not much care whether they stay. The fix is a first-day list, and the first-day list shows how to write one.

A crew usually sees who gets a bonus or a raise. With no written rule, the crew works out its own rule from what it sees, and it may not be the one you meant. Two documents fix this. A recognition rule keeps praise from riding on your mood that day, and the recognition rule shows how to write it. Pay bands give each job a pay range and a written rule for moving up it, so each person knows beforehand what earns a raise, and pay bands with a raise rule shows how.

At the orchard the sheet came out with two yes and two no. The raise would have reached every worker, and the two no lines point at documents the orchard can write itself.

Figure: The example orchard's sheet, filled in, with the document to write for each no. Invented for illustration
The example orchard's sheet: two yes and two noJob: yes, each person has a page of duties. First day: no, write a first-day list with a guide chosen ahead. Praise and raises: no, write a recognition rule and pay bands. Manager: yes, a signed list of what the manager decides alone.The orchard's sheetJobEach person has a pageof dutiesyesFirst dayWrite: a first-day listwith a guide chosen aheadnoPraise and raisesWrite: a recognition ruleand pay bandsnoManagerA signed list of whatthey decide aloneyes

What do I write first, and in how long?

A sheet of paper and about half an hour are enough to fill in the sheet. Each document has its own article in the people section of this site. If your list of departures names the boss or the job, start with the manager line or the job line. Otherwise start with the first no.

Figure: When to fill in the sheet and write the documents
Fill in the sheet today, write the first document next, fill it in again in three monthsFirst, about 30 minutes: fill in the sheet. Next: write the document for the first no. About three months later: fill in the sheet again.First, about 30 minutesFill in the sheetNextWrite the document for the first noAbout three months laterFill in the sheet again

When a departure is put down to the labor market, nothing is left for you to change. The sheet looks for the cause in what you control. A line still at no after three months can cost you another good worker, so the date on the calendar matters as much as the first sheet.

Provenance

Derives from
  1. Billikopf and González, Turnover rates are decreasing in California dairies, California Agriculture 66(4), 2012
  2. Hobbs, Klachky and Cooper, Job satisfaction assessments of agricultural workers help employers improve the work environment and reduce turnover, California Agriculture 74(1), 2020
  3. Rynes, Gerhart and Minette, The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do, Human Resource Management 43(4), 2004
  4. Moore, Durst, Ritter, Nobrega and Barkema, Effects of employer management on employee recruitment, satisfaction, engagement, and retention on large US dairy farms, Journal of Dairy Science 103(9), 2020
  5. Roy, Akbar, Rajapaksa and Rahman, Aligning labour force perceptions to job attraction, satisfaction and retention strategies in horticulture: A data-driven empirical study for Australian banana industry, PLOS ONE, 2026
  6. Lan, Hu and Nie, Unwilling or Unable? The Impact of Role Clarity and Job Competence on Frontline Employees' Taking Charge Behaviors in Hospitality Industry, Behavioral Sciences 15(4), 2025
What this article covers
A one-page, yes-or-no check of the four things beyond pay that you control: written job duties, a planned first day for new hires, a rule for praise and raises, and what your manager may decide without you, with the document to write for each no.
What it does not cover
It does not promise that anyone stays, more profit or lower cost, and it does not rate the worker, only how you manage. What a manager may legally sign or commit for the farm is a question for a lawyer where you farm.
Published
Updated
Error found
Point out an error and the article is corrected with a note on what changed.

How to cite this article

Rurivia. (2026, September 21). Why farm workers leave when the pay is good. https://rurivia.com/en/library/people/why-good-pay-does-not-keep-people/


Keep reading

People

How do you hear of a crew problem before a good hand quits?

Ask the crew how things are going and you hear that everything is fine. The problem with the foreman, or with you, comes out on the day a good hand asks for final pay.

Sep 21, 2026
People

Giving farm workers feedback before something goes wrong

Many workers hear about their work only when something breaks, and the owner reads the silence in between as approval. A talk on a date set in advance, against written criteria, with one line noted the same day, changes that.

Sep 21, 2026
People

Who checks what your most trusted person moves?

A worker leaves and only then do you learn that nobody else could open the bank app. Where one or two people handle the money, the check you can run is going over what your most trusted hand moved each month.

Sep 21, 2026
People

Who covers a farm task that only one person knows?

On many farms some tasks only one person knows how to do, and nobody notices until the morning that person is out. Mark who can do each task, circle the ones only one person can do, and train a back-up until that person can do the job alone.

Sep 21, 2026

Farm Management

If this article were a plant, farm management would be the whole field.

Planning, organizing, leading and controlling: the four functions, what each one decides, and a farm example for each, all on one page.